no third solution » Archive
Fair Market Value
Oakland, CA, is the latest on the list of municipalities to abuse excercise its power of Eminent Domain. Set aside, for a second, the glaring inconsistency – that Revelli Tire, which has been in existence for 56 years is being evicted in order to make room for a Sears Tire store. This is the politics of pull. Said City development director Dan Vederpriem, “[W]e offered far and away more than what the land value was.” . . . Well, er. No, not actually. Oakland offered more than what it thinks the land value was. If I offered you $100 for your Honus Wagner baseball card, using as justification, “I think $100 is more than a good deal, who would want that old piece of … Read entire article »
Filed under: Potpourri
score one for the little guys (or at least the out-of-staters)
The other day, I saw the news I wanted to see . . . I first heard about the situation here in Michigan a few months ago on the radio, but because I’m lazy I hadn’t paid much attention to it of late. Anyways, the situation was that Michigan had enacted a law forbidding the interstate sale of liquors/beers/wines – that is, you couldn’t buy mail order booze. It comes as no surprise that the “Special Interests” behind this legislation were the Michigan based alcohol distributors, and to an extent, some of the state’s vinyards. Now, this struck a chord for me on several levels – first was a free trade issue, if you can’t have free trade between states, you can’t expect to have anything like it between … Read entire article »
Filed under: Legalese, Michigan, Subsidize This!
more about hookers & blow
I’ve previously established my position with regards to the war on drugs. In any case, I mentioned prostitution a few days ago, and promised that I would address it. So I’ve been mulling it over, and I think that prostitution is even more defensible than drug legalization (which I believe is ultimately, constitutionally defensible, anyways.) I say this merely because the underlying elements to drug use/sale are currently illegal, whereas the underlying elements of prostitution are not. Explicit costs aside, I’m going to borrow the argument that I made regarding drugs: There is something seriously awry with a state that allows and/or encourages its peace officers to engage in “criminal behavior,” using as justification, the promise of bringing down more arbitrarily defined criminals. … Read entire article »
Filed under: Potpourri