A New Paradigm in Economic Theory?

October 5, 2006
By

I’ve recently been made aware of a new paradigm in economic theory, set forth, as far as I know, by a Don Byrne, PhD, who teaches at the University of Detroit Mercy, and Walsh College of Business & Accountancy. In a nutshell, it is:

“We are increasingly experiencing an evolution toward competitive free market capitalism. Growing competition reduces market power of both firms and the resources they employ. As costs rise and profits decline, the old remedy of raising prices to increase revenue becomes less and less effective in raising revenue and restoring profits. Economic theory tells us that as competition increases, price elasticity of demand at each price increases. The rationality of price increases in terms of maximizing profits declines. When competition increases, prices become more flexible downward as firms lose their control over pricing. As prices become less rigid downward and firms have less power to raise prices, the inflationary bias weakens. As firms lose their power to protect price by reducing output, and output cuts are moderated by falling prices, the recessionary bias is lessened.(source)”

A very important implication of this theory, especially as far as the Austrians & Keynesians (and most other economists who venture to tackle the Business Cycle) is the belief that – yes, the Business Cycle will continue to exist. But cyclical economic changes are no longer relevant, as the pace of technology has increased, the effects of structural changes have come to dominate the effects of any cyclical change.

I should have the opportunity to attend a week-long seminar on Monetary & Fiscal Policy, presented by Dr. Byrne, in a few weeks. It will cost a pretty penny, and in return, I’ll get three graduate credits that I don’t need.

Someone needs to be the student that surpasses the master…

2 Responses to A New Paradigm in Economic Theory?

  1. KipEsquire on October 6, 2006 at 6:48 am

    Does he cite one major industry where competition is actually increasing? I can’t think of any.

    The key observation of the modern era is exactly the opposite: that it’s perfectly okay for markets to move away from perfect competition, because it actually takes very few competitors to bring about the effects of competition.

    If we learn one thing from game theory, it’s that you only need two players.

  2. smilerz on October 6, 2006 at 10:00 am

    I get really skeptical when anyone claims that the economy is fundamentally different than it used to be.

    That, in the past, has meant we are very near the top of the curve and a recession is to be expected.