The two were not charged with indecency…

November 28, 2007
By

The two were not charged with indecency as the act [coitus] was performed with clothes on, police said.

Just, wow. That’s like suggesting that “I didn’t kill him — the bullet did!”

Given what I know about sexual intercourse (admittedly, I have a public-school education), doesn’t the act kind of require the unsheathing of the sword, if you will? And removing the tarp from the playing field? Granted, these things can be done with one’s clothes “on,” as long as you carefully and creatively define the word “on” to include “exposing one’s nether regions,” (in contrast to the purpose of clothes, which is to conceal one’s nether regions) and also, “partially off” (i.e., not totally “on”).

So the Danes are allowed to have intercourse in public, provided that their who-whos and willys are concealed? By this logic, they could be fully nude but draped in a large blanket or sleeping bag, in the middle of the street. Interesting…

Comments are closed.