Comments on: Going for Two

By: Tony

Tony — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:16:58 +0000

I agree, but NFL coaches seem to operate on the old investment theory that you can never go wrong investing in IBM. If you win, you did your job. If you lose, you did it responsibly. Blech.

By: Brad

Brad — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:35:07 +0000

Damn hackers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoy4_h7Pb3M&feature=related

By: 1955 Design

1955 Design — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:18:30 +0000

Your best men are obsessing over it, but I am not certain they are making much progress.

And remember, today is a holiday and the best men charge extra for their services today.

By: David Z

David Z — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:39:32 +0000

Thanks – I’ve got bigger problems with Adsense right now, since my site was hacked a few weeks ago. That’s why all the ads are directing you to “canadian pharmacies” or something. All my best men are working on resolving it, though.

By: Brad

Brad — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:13:25 +0000

I agree. Going for 2 is the way to go. The OT situation in the NFL is a bigger problem. It promotes going back to who has the best soccer player on their team. I think its funny because all football players call soccer players “pansies” or “sissies.” Now they are praying they have the baddest ass pansy because they were not man enough to ram it down the opponents throat during regulation. The NFL needs to go to college rules for OT. At least its entertaining.

I see you put Google Ads on your site. You have to put a privacy policy on your site or G will close your account. Here is one I use for free.
http://www.serprank.com/privacy-policy-generator/index.php